COMMENT ⊗   VALID 00008 PAGES
C REC  PAGE   DESCRIPTION
C00001 00001
C00002 00002	 SAIL
C00005 00003	∂06-May-82  0128	Mabry Tyson <Tyson at SRI-AI> 	MAS results for UCI Lisp
C00007 00004	 Franz
C00008 00005	 TAKR
C00009 00006	 NIL
C00010 00007	 SCORE Dec 11, 1983 interlisp
C00011 00008	 PSL SCORE 1/10/84
C00012 ENDMK
C⊗;
;;; SAIL
(timit)
(RUNTIME 0.855) 
(GCTIME 0.0) 
T 
(timit)
(RUNTIME 0.846) 
(GCTIME 0.0) 
T 
(timit)
(RUNTIME 0.848) 
(GCTIME 0.0) 
T 
(timit)
(RUNTIME 0.865) 
(GCTIME 0.0) 
T 
(timit)
(RUNTIME 0.875) 
(GCTIME 0.0) 
T 
(fasload takr)
(timit)
Timing performed on Tuesday 06/28/83 at 13:36:24.
Cpu (- GC) Time = 0.503
Elapsed Time = 2.33333334
Wholine Time = 1.13333334
GC Time = 0.0
Load Average Before  = 1.08481455
Load Average After   = 1.1070131
Average Load Average = 1.09591383
NIL 
Timing performed on Tuesday 06/28/83 at 13:36:31.
Cpu (- GC) Time = 0.489
Elapsed Time = 2.85
Wholine Time = 1.26666667
GC Time = 0.0
Load Average Before  = 1.13347363
Load Average After   = 1.1692226
Average Load Average = 1.15134811
NIL 
Timing performed on Tuesday 06/28/83 at 13:36:41.
Cpu (- GC) Time = 0.488
Elapsed Time = 1.4
Wholine Time = 1.18333334
GC Time = 0.0
Load Average Before  = 1.14669383
Load Average After   = 1.14716196
Average Load Average = 1.1469279
NIL 

(fasload takr)
(timit)
Timing performed on Wednesday 10/12/83 at 21:54:31.
Cpu (- GC) Time = 0.504
Elapsed Time = 3.75
Wholine Time = 1.31666666
GC Time = 0.0
Load Average Before  = 0.73297429
Load Average After   = 0.77994084
Average Load Average = 0.75645757
NIL 
Timing performed on Wednesday 10/12/83 at 21:54:46.
Cpu (- GC) Time = 0.489
Elapsed Time = 1.91666667
Wholine Time = 1.18333334
GC Time = 0.0
Load Average Before  = 0.85608256
Load Average After   = 0.86739135
Average Load Average = 0.86173695
NIL 
∂06-May-82  0128	Mabry Tyson <Tyson at SRI-AI> 	MAS results for UCI Lisp
Date:  6 May 1982 0126-PDT
From: Mabry Tyson <Tyson at SRI-AI>
Subject: MAS results for UCI Lisp
To: rpg at SU-AI

TAK program with 100 different TAKs for UCI Lisp (version from University of
Texas running on SRI-AI Tops-20 2060 with compatibility package.)

Notes on this program:  The SUB1 is generic and is not compiled in-line.

(TAK 18. 12. 6.)
Interpreted: 22.485 seconds
Compiled, no fast links: 5.124 seconds
Compiled, fast links: 1.099 seconds


(The slowdown for the first two results may be due to increased time to search
the OBLIST.  I don't know why the third time is 7% slower than the recursive
TAK.  It might be due to increased swapping from other jobs??)
-------

;;; Franz
I think they mean TAKR here.
∂08-May-82  2148	Kim.jkf at Berkeley 	updated mas benchmark results
Date: 8 May 1982 21:41:30-PDT
From: Kim.jkf at Berkeley
To: rpg@su-ai
Subject: updated mas benchmark results
Cc: Kim.fateman@Berkeley

  I ran it with local functions and here are the complete results:

mas benchmark (tak benchmark using tak0 through tak99)
Lisp Opus 38.16,
Liszt 8.06

				780			750

slow links			13.26			19.17

normal links			 3.62			 5.09

local functions			 1.7			 2.7

slow links = translink nil, fast links = translink on


;;; TAKR

D3
Display-up
Elapsed .715
CPU	.715

D3
Display-down
Elapsed .677
CPU	.677

D2
7/5/83, without interrupts
Elapsed	3.42
CPU	3.42
;;; NIL
TAKR
cpu=5.71,elapsed=5.71,pf=0
[Why?  I don't know why.  I don't know anything about the hardware
here.  I did it a couple times to make sure.]
;;; SCORE Dec 11, 1983 interlisp
Block compiled

2.162 seconds
0.0 gc
;;; PSL SCORE 1/10/84
(tak0)
***** `TAK0' is an undefined function
***** Continuable error: retry form is `(TAK0)'
Break loop
49 lisp break>>> (load takr)
NIL
Cpu time: 367 ms
50 lisp break>>> (tak0 18 12 6)
7
Cpu time: 3101 ms
51 lisp break>>> (tak0 18 12 6)
7
Cpu time: 3099 ms
52 lisp break>>> (tak0 18 12 6)
 14:52:51 PSL Running at 1,,42642  Used 1:03:44.8 in 3:03:54, Load   2.42
7
Cpu time: 3205 ms
53 lisp break>>> (tak0 18 12 6)
7
Cpu time: 3117 ms
54 lisp break>>>